Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Malkin’s Hate-Couture

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

What could the overly-spunky, more-than-occasionally annoying Rachael Ray, host of twenty-minute meals, have to do with national security? No, it’s not because she’s good with a knife. We’ll give you a hint: see if you can spot the “hate-couture” in this photo:

 

 

Rachael Ray terrorist mouthpiece

 
Still not seeing it? Okay, now take a look at this:
 
Yasir Arafat
 
Coincidence? Certainly not:
 

A few months after doughnuts became a presidential campaign issue, they stood at the center of a storm created by right-leaning bloggers. This was a story about “donuts and dumb celebrities” who were “mainstreaming terrorism” to make a buck, asserted Little Green Footballs and Michele Malkin. And Atlas Shrugs revised a bell-ringing catchphrase thusly: “TIME TO MAKE THE JIHAD!

Suddenly, Dunkin’ Donuts was accused of promoting terrorism, thanks to the wardrobe choices of Rachael Ray, its celebrity spokesman, during an online advertisement. According to the bloggers, she had decided to embrace “hate couture” by wearing a keffiyeh, a scarf popular in the Arab world and preferred by Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian militants during their rise in the West Bank and Gaza.

Now, Dunkin’ Donuts has pulled the ads. Not since the Little Mermaid video cover was found to have palaces shaped like phalluses have our impressionable children been this safe.

We believe there is a far greater threat to our National Security. Watch, if you dare:

 

  Does that skirt look like anyone’s headscarf that we know?

Malkin\'s Hate-Coture

Sphere: Related Content

Titanic Mission Cover for Top Secret Mission

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

It turns out the historic search for the wreckage of the Titanic is more like something out of a Clive Cussler novel. It turns out, Dr. Bob Ballard’s discovery of the Titanic was actually cover for a top secret mission to inspect the nearby wreckage of nuclear submarines, the USS Thresher and USS Scorpion. The Thresher sank after a high-pressure pipe blew, causing the sub to lose power. The Scorpion, however, was thought to have perhaps been sunk by the Soviets:

 

[T]he USS Scorpion disappeared in 1968 amid speculation that it was sunk by Soviet forces.

Dr Ballard mapped both submarine wrecks using his newly developed underwater robot craft. He concluded that the most likely cause of the Scorpion’s destruction was being hit by a rogue torpedo it had fired itself.

 

Dr. Ballard also studied the nuclear reactors to see if they posed any environmental risk - a real question since the U.S. was considering sinking reactors at sea as a way to cut the nuclear fleet to comply with Salt II in the 80s.

Sphere: Related Content

Daily Patriot

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

Should Obama distance himself from Maori activist?

Tuesday, April 15th, 2008

 

 

Maori Activist Protests New Zealand\'s Anti-Terror Laws

Maori extremists protest New Zealand’s anti-terror laws — where is Obama?

 

Sphere: Related Content

Top Ten Headlines for Surveillance Revelations

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

Now that ABC is reporting http://blogs.abcnews.com/… that the surveillance program is tracking down journalists’ sources, I assume we can expect the following headlines:

 

1) Surveillance Program Sparks Bush Rebound
2) Democrats Fail to Capitalize on NSA Revelations
3) Congress Sees Spying Program ‘Fatigue’
4) Washington Post Implicated in Terrorist Investigation
5) Spying Program: Scandal or Our Liberal Bias?
6) Bush Gets Tough on Leakers
7) Hearings on Phone Call Monitoring Could Hamper National Security
8) Bloggers Get Shrill Over NSA Hoo-Haw
9) Benefits of Tapping My Phone MixedLiberal ‘Overreaction’ Misses Complexity (Joe Klien, Thomas Friedman, Joe Lieberman)
10) Reporting Wrongdoing Dangerous in Time of War

Sphere: Related Content

The Banana: Defending the Anti-Terror Tool

Monday, February 20th, 2006

banana up guy\'s ass

Look closely at the object protruding from the man’s rear end. What you see is a vital tool in the nation’s War against Terror. We’re not sure what it is, but if we were to venture a guess, we’d say that is a banana that’s been shoved up a man’s ass. Let us ponder how it got there. Was there a warrant issued? Did someone present evidence to prove sufficient cause before inserting the banana?

Trust us. It was vital that the banana be there. Obtaining a warrant before inserting the banana would have endangered lives. Every second the banana was resting in a bowl on a table somewhere instead of in this man’s bowels were seconds this country could not afford to spare. Our national security depended on that banana being exactly where it is, nuzzled between this man’s butt cheeks, halfway to his prostate. To NOT put the banana there would be giving this man exactly what he wanted.

We certainly wouldn’t want to imperil our national security. If it was imperative that the banana be shoved into this man’s ass immediately, perhaps some official permission might have been obtained retroactively?

 

No. We do not need to justify why the banana had to be where it was. Letting you know the reason for putting the banana there would be tipping off the terrorists to our techniques. They could use this information about our anti-terror tactics against us.  Not shoving a banana up his ass would be letting the terrorists win. I find it funny how you show so much sympathy for terrorists. What about the people he’s killed?

Did he kill anybody?

He must have. There’s a banana in his ass. Would there be a banana in his ass if he didn’t kill anybody?

I don’t know. Would there?

We can’t tell you. But believe me, we had our reasons.

Isn’t it illegal?

No. The Geneva Conventions forbid the use of torture. We would never torture.

How do you define torture? At the very least, this looks to be very unpleasant for the man.

Prison isn’t supposed to be a country club, and believe me, back in our college days we shoved bananas up people’s asses if they wanted to join the Skull and Bones. To be torture, it would have to cause pain equivalent to death or catastrophic organ failure. As you can see, this man’s organs are still functioning.  He’s just going to be shitting blood for a while.

So, it’s not torture unless that man dies?  Okay. What happens then?

We can’t be held responsible if the man dies, because we didn’t mean to do it.

Don’t you think shoving bananas up people’s asses might be part of the reason why they hate us?

No. He hates us for our freedom.

Well, after all this, I hope it worked.

Did what work?

Shoving a banana up this man’s ass.

Sadly, sometimes we find only being able to shove a banana up a man’s ass to be far too limiting to effectively fight the War on Terror. Often more extreme measures are required.

Like what?

Like extraditing prisoners to countries that are not as constrained by the dictates of Political Correctness. Some people in this country still have a problem seeing anything worse than a banana shoved up a man’s ass.  

Don’t you worry that it hurts America’s image abroad to see these photos of a banana in a man’s ass?

Yes I do. That’s why they never should have been released. There needs to be an investigation.

But you can’t stop leaking. Perhaps it would be easier not to stick a banana up a man’s ass in the first place?

Believe me, Saddam’s done far worse, so we’ve got a long way to go before you’re in any position to complain about it.  I don’t hear you whining about what Saddam did.

I thought we were supposed to be better.

We are better. We have other people do the really rough stuff.

Do you ever worry that the banana in the man’s ass will get a lot of media attention in the US?

No. So far the media has not uncovered any evidence of Democrats sticking banana’s in people’s rear ends. They can’t report this until they can say Democrats have done it also.

Do you ever worry that the people will rise up against this kind of tactic?

No. They love their country too much to do that.  They know how important that banana is.  They know we wouldn’t shove a banana up a man’s ass unless it was absolutely necessary.

But if they do?

Then there should be an investigation. This administration does not tolerate leakers.

Sphere: Related Content